|
Assistive Technology State Grant Program
District of Columbia State Plan for FY 2009-2011 (submitted FY
2010)
|
|
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
Page 1
|
A
|
Identification and
Description of Lead Agency and Implementing Entity; Change in Lead Agency or
Implementing Entity
|
|
|
|
|
Page 2
|
B
|
Advisory Council, Budget
Allocations, and Identification of Activities Conducted
|
|
|
|
|
C
|
State Financing
Activities
|
|
Financial loan program
|
N/A
|
|
Access to telework loan fund
|
N/A
|
|
Cooperative buying
program
|
N/A
|
|
Financing for home modifications
program
|
N/A
|
|
Telecommunications
distribution program
|
N/A
|
|
Last resort program
|
N/A
|
|
Other program
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
D
|
Device Reutilization
Activities
|
|
Device exchange
|
N/A
|
|
Page 3
|
Device reassignment
|
|
|
|
|
Page 4
|
E
|
Device Loan Activity
|
|
|
|
|
Page 5
|
F
|
Device Demonstration
Activity
|
|
|
|
|
G
|
State Leadership
Activities
|
|
Page 6
|
Training Activities
|
|
|
Page 7
|
Technical Assistance
Activities
|
|
|
Page 8
|
Public Awareness
Activities
|
|
|
Page 9
|
Information and
Assistance Activities
|
|
|
|
|
Page 10
|
H
|
Assurances and Signatures
|
|
|
Page 1 of 10
Assistive Technology State Grant Program
District of Columbia State Plan for FY 2009-2011 (submitted FY
2010)
|
|
Section A. Identification and Description of Lead Agency and
Implementing Entity; Change in Lead Agency or Implementing Entity
|
|
|
|
1
|
Name Given to Statewide
AT Program.
|
Assistive Technology
Program for the District of Columbia
|
|
|
|
2
|
Website dedicated to
Statewide AT Program
|
http://www.atpdc.org
|
|
|
|
3
|
Name and Address of Lead
Agency
|
|
District of Columbia
Department on Disability Services Rehabilitation Services Administration
810 First Street, N.E. 10th Floor
Washington, DC 20002
|
|
|
|
4
|
Name, Title, and Contact
Information for Lead Agency Certifying Representative.
|
|
Roy Albert
Deputy Director of the Rehabilitation Services Administration (DC RSA)
810 First Street, N.E.
Washington, DC 20002
Roy.Albert@dc.gov
(202) 442-8663
|
|
|
|
5
|
Information about
Program Director at Lead Agency.
|
|
Roy Albert
Deputy Director of the Rehabilitation Services Administration (DC RSA)
810 First Street, N.E.
Washington, DC 20002
Roy.Albert@dc.gov
(202) 442-8663
|
|
|
|
6
|
Information about
Program Contact(s) at Lead Agency.
|
|
Roy Albert
Deputy Director of the Rehabilitation Services Administration (DC RSA)
810 First Street, N.E.
Washington, DC 20002
Roy.Albert@dc.gov
|
|
|
|
7
|
Telephone at Lead Agency
for Public.
|
202-442-8663
|
|
|
|
8
|
E-mail at Lead Agency
for Public.
|
Roy.Albert@dc.gov
|
|
|
|
9
|
Select the most
appropriate descriptor of the agency/division/bureau directly responsible for
the Statewide AT Program within the Lead Agency.
|
|
General or Combined
Vocational Rehabilitation Agency
|
|
|
|
10
|
If Other was selected
for question 9, identify and describe the agency.
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
Does your Lead Agency
contract with an Implementing Entity to carry out the Statewide AT Program on
its behalf?
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
If you answered no to
question 11, you may skip ahead to the next page. Otherwise, you must answer
the following questions.
|
|
|
|
12
|
Name and Address of
Implementing Entity.
|
|
University Legal
Services
220 I Street, N.E., Suite 130
Washington, DC 20002
|
|
|
|
13
|
Information about
Program Director at the Implementing Entity.
|
|
Jane Brown
Executive Director
University Legal Services
220 I Street, N.E., Suite 130
Washington, DC 20002
jbrown@uls-dc.org
|
|
|
|
14
|
Information about
Program Contact(s) at Implementing Entity.
|
|
Alicia C. Johns
Program Manager
Assistive Technology Program for the District of Columbia
220 I Street, N.E., Suite 130
Washington, DC 20002
ajohns@uls-dc.org
|
|
|
|
15
|
Telephone at
Implementing Entity for Public.
|
202-547-0198
|
|
|
|
16
|
E-mail at Implementing
Entity for Public.
|
advocacy@uls-dc.org
|
|
|
|
17
|
Select the most
appropriate descriptor of the type of organization that is the Implementing
Entity.
|
|
Protection and Advocacy
organization
|
|
|
|
18
|
If Other was selected,
identify and describe the entity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
Describe the mechanisms
established to ensure coordination of activities and collaboration between
the Implementing Entity and the state.
|
|
The Implementing Entity,
University Legal Services will enter into a contract with the District of
Columbias Lead Agency (the District of Columbia Department Department on Disability Services Rehabilitation Services
Administration or DC RSA). This contract will set forth activities that ATPDC
must conduct on behalf of DC RSA and the system oversight to be provided by
the U.S. Department of Education. A DC RSA Project Officer will oversee
administration of the contract, and the Program Manager of ATPDC will meet
quarterly with this Project Officer to discuss activities and the implementation
of this state plan.
The Project Officer or designee will attend all Advisory Council meetings for
ATPDC, while the ATPDC Program Manager will serve on the advisory committee
to DC RSA. ATPDC will submit monthly expenditures reports to the DC RSA
Administrator for review and appropriate assistance to ATPDC. ATPDC will also
provide quarterly and annual reports to DC RSA on activities completed,
activities planned, and any data related those activities.
|
|
|
|
20
|
Is the Lead Agency named
in this State Plan a new or different Lead Agency from the one designated by
the Governor in your previous State Plan?
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
If you answered no to
question 20, you may skip ahead to the next page. Otherwise, you must answer
the following questions.
|
|
|
|
21
|
Explain why the Lead
Agency previously designated by your state should not serve as the Lead
Agency.
|
|
In 1993 Mayor Sharon
Pratt Kelly designated the District of Columbia Department of Human Services,
Rehabilitation Services Administration (RSA), the state vocational
rehabilitation program, as the lead agency for the Statewide Assistive
Technology Program for the District of Columbia (ATPDC). The mission of the
ATPDC is to increase the provision of, access to, and funding for assistive
technology for residents of the District of Columbia with disabilities
through a variety of District-wide, comprehensive activities and services.
Since
1998, University Legal Services (ULS) has been directly responsible for the
ATPDC.
In April, 2007 Mayor Adrian Fenty named Judith E. Heumann, a widely recognized leader inthe
disability rights movement both in the US and throughout the world, to be the
first director of the District of Columbia Department on Disability Services
(DDS). The mission of the new Department on Disability Services is to provide
innovative, high quality services that enable people with disabilities to
lead meaningful and productive lives as vital members of their families,
schools, workplaces and communities in every neighborhood in the District of
Columbia. Currently, it provides services to more than 10,000 residents with
disabilities through its two administrations: Developmental Disabilities
Administration (DDA) that enables
people with intellectual and developmental disabilities to live meaningful
and productive lives in our community; and, Rehabilitation Services
Administration (DC RSA) that offers training and vocational rehabilitation
services aimed at assisting people with disabilities to prepare for and
retain employment.
|
|
|
|
22
|
Explain why the Lead
Agency newly designated by your state should not serve as the Lead Agency.
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
Is the Implementing
Entity named in this State Plan a new or different Implementing Entity from
the one designated by the Governor in your previous State Plan?
|
|
No
|
|
|
|
If you answered no or
not applicable to question 23, you may skip ahead to the next page.
Otherwise, you must answer the following questions.
|
|
|
|
24
|
Explain why the
Implementing Entity previously designated by your state should not serve as
the Implementing Entity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
Explain why the
Implementing Entity newly designated by your state should serve as the
Implementing Entity
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 2 of 10
Assistive Technology State Grant Program
District of Columbia State Plan for FY 2009-2011 (submitted FY
2010)
|
|
Section B: Advisory Council, Budget Allocations, and
Identification of Activities Conducted
NOTE: You MUST answer
questions 13 and 14 in order to set up the rest of your form.
|
|
|
|
1
|
In accordance with
section 4(c)(2) of the AT Act of 1998, as amended our state has a
consumer-majority advisory council that provides consumer-responsive,
consumer-driven advice to the state for planning of, implementation of, and
evaluation of the activities carried out through the grant, including setting
measurable goals. This advisory council is geographically representative of
the State and reflects the diversity of the State with respect to race,
ethnicity, types of disabilities across the age span, and users of types of
services that an individual with a disability may receive.
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
2
|
The advisory council
includes a representative of the designated State agency, as defined in
section 7 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 705)
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
3
|
The advisory council
includes a representative of the State agency for individuals who are blind
(within the meaning of section 101 of that Act (29 U.S.C. 721));
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
4
|
The advisory council
includes a representative of a State center for independent living described
in part C of title VII of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 796f et
seq.);
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
5
|
The advisory council
includes a representative of the State workforce investment board established
under section 111 of the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (29 U.S.C. 2821);
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
6
|
The advisory council
includes a representative of the State educational agency, as defined in
section 9101 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
7
|
The advisory council
includes other representatives (list below)
|
|
The membership of the
Assistive Technology Program for the District of Columbia Advisory Council
includes representation from seven of the eight Wards in the District of
Columbia. The Advisory Council reflects the racial and ethnic diversity of
the city. Members use a variety of assistive technology devices, such as
mobility devices, augmentative communication devices, devices and software
for individuals who are blind and computer adaptations.
The individuals with disabilities include an Adjunct Professor at Howard
University and the University of the District of Columbia who teaches two
courses in technology/multimedia technology and conducts training workshops
on assistive technology and Smart Classes; an attorney who provides
advocacy and legal counsel to individuals with and without disabilities
through her private law practice; a member who works for the Library of
Congress, National Library Service for the Blind and Physically Handicapped;
University Legal Services Supervising Housing Counselor; and parent with
child with intellectural disabilities. The advisory
council membership also includes a representative from the Children's
National Medical Center Transition Services, Division of Pediatric
Rehabilitation.
|
|
|
|
8
|
The advisory council
includes the following number of individuals with disabilities that use
assistive technology or their family members or guardians:
|
6
|
|
|
|
9
|
If the Statewide AT
Program does not have the composition and representation required under
section 4(c)(2)(B), explain below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
Proposed Budget
Allocations
|
|
State-level Activities
|
Proposed Budget
Allocation for Entire Annual Award
|
|
State Financing
Activities
|
Not performed due to
flexibility
|
|
Device Reutilization
Activities
|
more than $100,000
|
|
Device Loan Activity
|
$30,001-$40,000
|
|
Device Demonstration
Activity
|
$70,001-$80,000
|
|
State Leadership
Activities
|
$90,001-$100,000
|
|
|
|
11
|
For every activity for
which you selected "claiming comparability" in item 10, describe
the comparable activity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
Describe your planned
procedures for tracking expenditures for State-level and State Leadership
activities.
|
|
All programs of
University Legal Services (ULS) use the same Microsoft Information Product
(MIP) accounting system to record and track expenditures and revenue. A
coding system has been developed within MIP to enable detailed accounting by
contract or grant and type of expenditure. ULS will use MIP to code and track
expenditures as State Level and State Leadership Activities accordingly. At
any time, a report can be obtained to monitor expenditures to assure that the
AT Program for the District of Columbia is in compliance with the percentages
and budget amounts specified in the State Plan. The ATPDC Program Manager
will be responsible for monitoring expenditures on a monthly basis. The
Assistive Technology Program for the District of Columbia will exercise
flexibility regarding the financial activities for this state plan. Our
proposed budget allocations will be State-level Activities 70% and State
Leadership Activities 30%.
|
|
|
|
13
|
State Financing
Activities Performed
|
|
State Financing
Activities
|
Activities Performed
(select all that apply)
|
|
Financial loan program
|
|
|
Access to telework loan fund
|
|
|
Cooperative buying
program
|
|
|
Financing for home
modifications program
|
|
|
Telecommunications
distribution program
|
|
|
Last resort program
|
|
|
Other program
|
|
|
5
|
If you
conduct this activity by providing financial or in-kind support to other
entities, identify the kinds of entities you support in column a of the
following table.
|
|
If you
receive financial or in-kind support from the state to conduct this
activity, identify the state entities that provide this support in column b
of the following table.
|
|
If you
receive financial or in-kind support from private entities, identify the
private entities that provide this support in column c of the following
table.
|
|
If you
coordinate and collaborate with other entities in conducting this activity,
identify those entities in column d of the following table.
|
|
Organization
or Activity
|
a. You
provide support
|
b. Receive
support from the state
|
c. Receive
support from these private entities
|
d.
Collaborate with
|
|
AgrAbility Program
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Alliance
for Technology Access Center
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Bank or
other financial institution
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Community
Living agency
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
Easter
Seals
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Education-related
agency
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Employment-related
agency
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Health,
allied health, and rehabilitation-related agency
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Independent
Living Center
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Institution
of Higher Education
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Non-categorical
disability organization
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Organization
that primarily serves individuals who are blind or visually impaired
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Organization
that primarily serves individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Organization
that primarily serves individuals with developmental disabilities
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Organization
that primarily serves individuals with physical disabilities
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Organization
focused specifically on providing AT
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Protection
and Advocacy Organization
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
Technology
agency
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
UCP
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Other
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
Select the
option that best describes from where this activity is conducted.
|
|
One
central location
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
If you
indicated the use of regional sites, from how many regional sites is the
activity conducted?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
This
activity is available (choose all that apply)
|
|
By website
|
No
|
|
By phone
|
Yes
|
|
By e-mail
|
Yes
|
|
By mail
|
Yes
|
|
In person
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
Select the
option that best describes the policy of the program for charging
individuals with disabilities for a device.
|
|
Nothing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
Select the
option that best describes the policy of the program for charging
professionals for a device.
|
|
Nothing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
How do you
get the device to the consumer?
|
|
The
consumer picks up the device at a designated site
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
In the
following table, select by device type how the device is reassigned. Select
the top two used by the program.
|
|
Type of
device
|
Based on
consumer choice and/or request
|
A
professional recommendation is required
|
Qualified
program staff match it to the consumer
|
Qualified
consultants and/or volunteers match it to the consumer
|
The device
is provided through a qualified third-party
|
Not applicable
- this type of device is not made available
|
|
Vision
|
Yes
|
No
|
Yes
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Hearing
|
Yes
|
No
|
Yes
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Speech
Communication
|
Yes
|
No
|
Yes
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Learning,
Cognition, and Developmental
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Mobility,
Seating, and Positioning
|
Yes
|
No
|
Yes
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Daily
Living
|
Yes
|
No
|
Yes
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Environmental
Adaptations
|
Yes
|
No
|
Yes
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Vehicle
Modification and Transportation
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Recreation,
Sports, and Leisure Equipment
|
Yes
|
No
|
Yes
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Computer
and Associated Equipment
|
Yes
|
No
|
Yes
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
If
applicable, describe how consumers demonstrate the need for devices.
|
|
The
majority of consumers are referred by social workers, clinicians,
therapists and other community organizations. All recipients are required
to complete a loan agreement which includes information about their
diagnosed condition(s) and physician contact information.
|
|
|
14
|
Describe
any supports provided to the consumer to ensure successful use of the
device.
|
|
Staff
provides on-site training on the use of the equipment as per manufacturers
guidelines and consumers agreements in writing to consult with professional
health providers (PTs, OTs, personal physicians) to determine the
suitability and fit of the equipment.
|
|
|
15
|
If this is
an open-ended loan program, describe it.
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
Provide
any additional information about this activity you wish to share.
|
|
Over the
next three years, AT Program for the District of Columbia will collaborate
with The Washington Area Wheelchair Society, Independent Living for the
Handicapped (ILH), state, federal and other local community organizations
including churches, civic, volunteer, professional organizations, community
volunteer groups, corporations and other relevant organizations to expand
the statewide equipment recycling program. This program known as the
District of Columbia Disability Equipment Recycling Program (DC Shares)
will increase acquisition of AT by providing new and used assistive
technology devices and Durable Medical Equipment (DME) to District of
Columbia residents who are in need. DC Shares will not require an
eligibility requirement. Anyone needing equipment and unable to acquire it
through Medicaid, Medicare, vocational rehabilitation, or special education
can use the program to acquire the equipment they need. This new and used
equipment is available at no cost for District of Columbia residents with
disabilities or those who have a dependent with a disability, regardless of
their type of disability, age, income level or location of residence within
the city or the type of assistive technology. DC Shares receives
supplementing funding under the AT Reuse Demonstration Grant from the U.S.
Department of Education, Rehabilitation Services Administration. This
additional funding has allowed the Equipment Recycling Program to provide
more recycled equipment including computers to more undeserved individuals
with disabilities.
|
|
|
|
|
Page 4 of 10
Assistive Technology State Grant Program
District of Columbia State Plan for FY 2011-2013
E Device Loan Activity (1 of 1)
|
|
|
|
1
|
Select the
option that best describes the type of program.
|
|
General
program
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
If you
indicated that you have a device loan program for targeted consumers or
devices, describe the specific types of consumers or devices for whom this
device loan program is intended and why.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
If you
indicated that you have a device loan program for targeted agencies or
entities, identify the entity or agency and describe the purpose of the
program.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
If you
selected other, describe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
Enter the
year when the program began conducting this activity.
|
2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
Who
conducts this activity? Check all that apply.
|
|
The
Statewide AT Program
|
Yes
|
|
Other
entities (e.g. contractors)
|
No
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
The
Statewide AT Program provides and/or receives the following support (choose
all that apply).
|
|
Provides
financial support to other entities via an agreement with the Statewide AT
Program.
|
No
|
|
Provides
in-kind support to other entities via an agreement with the Statewide AT
Program.
|
No
|
|
Receives
financial support from the state.
|
No
|
|
Receives
in-kind support from the state.
|
No
|
|
Receives
financial support from private entities.
|
No
|
|
Receives
in-kind support from private entities.
|
No
|
|
Coordinates
and collaborates with other entities for the purpose of establishing a new
program or service.
|
Yes
|
|
Coordinates
and collaborates with other entities for the purpose of expanding an
existing program or service.
|
Yes
|
|
Coordinates
and collaborates with other entities for the purpose of reducing
duplication of programs or services.
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
If you
conduct this activity by providing financial or in-kind support to other
entities, identify the kinds of entities you support in column a of the following
table.
|
|
If you
receive financial or in-kind support from the state to conduct this
activity, identify the state entities that provide this support in column b
of the following table.
|
|
If you
receive financial or in-kind support from private entities, identify the
private entities that provide this support in column c of the following
table.
|
|
If you
coordinate and collaborate with other entities in conducting this activity,
identify those entities in column d of the following table.
|
|
Organization
or Activity
|
a. You
provide support
|
b. Receive
support from the state
|
c. Receive
support from these private entities
|
d.
Collaborate with
|
|
AgrAbility Program
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Alliance
for Technology Access Center
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Bank or
other financial institution
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Community
Living agency
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Easter
Seals
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Education-related
agency
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Employment-related
agency
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Health,
allied health, and rehabilitation-related agency
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Independent
Living Center
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Institution
of Higher Education
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Non-categorical
disability organization
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Organization
that primarily serves individuals who are blind or visually impaired
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Organization
that primarily serves individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Organization
that primarily serves individuals with developmental disabilities
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Organization
that primarily serves individuals with physical disabilities
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Organization
focused specifically on providing AT
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Protection
and Advocacy Organization
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Technology
agency
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
UCP
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Other
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
Select the
option that best describes from where this activity is conducted.
|
|
One
central location
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
If you
indicated the use of regional sites, from how many regional sites is the
activity conducted?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
This
activity is available (choose all that apply)
|
|
By website
|
Yes
|
|
By phone
|
Yes
|
|
By e-mail
|
Yes
|
|
By mail
|
No
|
|
In person
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
Select the
option that best describes the policy of the program for charging
individuals with disabilities for a loan.
|
|
Nothing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
Select the
option that best describes the policy of the program for charging
professionals for a loan.
|
|
Nothing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
Describe
any supports provided to the consumer to ensure a successful loan.
|
|
Borrowers
are able to call and receive information about available devices and then
visit the DCATRC to pick up the device(s) they wish to use. The
manufacturers instructions or a quick reference sheet will be available
upon request. Shipment of the devices within the city is available for a
nominal charge. Borrowers are required to complete an application which
outlines the responsibility of the device loan equipment. Loans are
generally limited to a maximum of five devices at a time, and the term of
the loan will be for up to a four week period, with extensions available
upon request.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
Devices in
the load pool also are made available for the following (choose all that
apply).
|
|
Device
demonstrations
|
Yes
|
|
Evaluations
and assessments
|
Yes
|
|
Training
|
Yes
|
|
Public
awareness
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
How do you
get the device to the consumer?
|
|
The
consumer picks up the device at a designated site
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
Provide
any additional information about this activity you wish to share.
|
|
The
Assistive Technology Program for the District of Columbia (ATPDC) will
operate a short-term AT equipment loan program, Device Loan Program through
the DC Assistive Technology Resource Center. The equipment that can be
borrowed is limited because the DC AT Resource Center uses the same
assistive technology devices to conduct demonstrations. The Device Loan
Program assists individuals with disabilities and professionals in decision
making before the purchase of the equipment, accommodates interim needs for
device repair or funding, and other purposes such as self-education and
training by clinicians to use a device to assess clients. Federal and local
government agencies representatives borrow AT devices from this program to
provide training and demonstrations to their employers and employees about
the benefits of AT devices in the work environment. The Device Loan Program
includes devices for individuals with visual, speech, hearing, physical,
and mobility impairments
During the next three years the Device Loan Program will implement the
following strategies on an ongoing basis to broaden the loan programs
usefulness to individuals with disabilities:
1)The Device Loan Program will continue to upgrade the outdated equipment
by partnerships with vendors and seek additional funding from government
and private organizations and will increase inventory by purchasing AT
devices and educational software, which are not only to support for adults
in postsecondary education but also for K-12 students. Due to reduced
funding for all AT Programs, APTDC will purchase some of the most requested
devices depending on funding availability. The AT Program for Washington,
DC will refer customers to other assistive technology programs in the
District of Columbia that may have a larger inventory of more current
assistive technology devices and software.
2) AT program staff will solicit donations of assistive technology devices
from local and national assistive technology vendors for both demonstration
and device loan programs to increase the inventory of equipment that
individuals can borrow from the Equipment Loan Program that will meet
specific needs for individuals with disabilities.
3)The AT Program for DC (ATPDC) will market the device loan program through
flyers distributed to disability-related agencies and organizations, on the
ATPDC web site and through ATPDC public awareness activities and subsequent
word of mouth by users. ATPDC will advertise the Device Loan Program
in local community newspapers targeting their technology or health
sections, list the program on various free classified web pages, post our
services using podcasting and blogging sites, and distribute the program
flyers to local employment agencies like one stop centers and public
libraries.
|
|
|
|
|
Page 5 of 10
Assistive Technology State Grant Program
District of Columbia State Plan for FY 2011-2013
F Device Demonstration Activity (1 of 1)
|
|
|
|
1
|
Select the
option that best describes the type of program.
|
|
General
program
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
If you
indicated that you have a device demonstration program for targeted
consumers or devices, describe the specific types of consumers or devices
for whom this device demonstration program is intended and why.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
If you
indicated that you have a device demonstration program for targeted
agencies or entities, identify the entity or agency and describe the
purpose of the program.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
If you
selected other, describe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
Enter the
year when the program began conducting this activity.
|
1999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
Who
conducts this activity? Check all that apply.
|
|
The
Statewide AT Program
|
Yes
|
|
Other
entities (e.g. contractors)
|
No
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
The
Statewide AT Program provides and/or receives the following support (choose
all that apply).
|
|
Provides
financial support to other entities via an agreement with the Statewide AT
Program.
|
No
|
|
Provides
in-kind support to other entities via an agreement with the Statewide AT
Program.
|
No
|
|
Receives
financial support from the state.
|
No
|
|
Receives
in-kind support from the state.
|
Yes
|
|
Receives
financial support from private entities.
|
No
|
|
Receives
in-kind support from private entities.
|
Yes
|
|
Coordinates
and collaborates with other entities for the purpose of establishing a new
program or service.
|
Yes
|
|
Coordinates
and collaborates with other entities for the purpose of expanding an
existing program or service.
|
Yes
|
|
Coordinates
and collaborates with other entities for the purpose of reducing
duplication of programs or services.
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
If you
conduct this activity by providing financial or in-kind support to other
entities, identify the kinds of entities you support in column a of the
following table.
|
|
If you
receive financial or in-kind support from the state to conduct this
activity, identify the state entities that provide this support in column b
of the following table.
|
|
If you
receive financial or in-kind support from private entities, identify the
private entities that provide this support in column c of the following
table.
|
|
If you
coordinate and collaborate with other entities in conducting this activity,
identify those entities in column d of the following table.
|
|
Organization
or Activity
|
a. You
provide support
|
b. Receive
support from the state
|
c. Receive
support from these private entities
|
d.
Collaborate with
|
|
AgrAbility Program
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Alliance
for Technology Access Center
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Bank or
other financial institution
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Community
Living agency
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Easter
Seals
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Education-related
agency
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Employment-related
agency
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Health,
allied health, and rehabilitation-related agency
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Independent
Living Center
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Institution
of Higher Education
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Non-categorical
disability organization
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Organization
that primarily serves individuals who are blind or visually impaired
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Organization
that primarily serves individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Organization
that primarily serves individuals with developmental disabilities
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Organization
that primarily serves individuals with physical disabilities
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Organization
focused specifically on providing AT
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Protection
and Advocacy Organization
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Technology
agency
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
UCP
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Other
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
Select the
option that best describes from where this activity is conducted.
|
|
One
central location
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
If you
indicated the use of regional sites, from how many regional sites is the
activity conducted?
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
This
activity is available (choose all that apply)
|
|
By website
|
No
|
|
By phone
|
Yes
|
|
By e-mail
|
Yes
|
|
By mail
|
Yes
|
|
In person
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
Select the
option that best describes the primary type of demonstrations provided by
the program.
|
|
In-person
demonstrations from a fixed location
|
|
Select the
option that best describes the secondary type of demonstrations provided by
the program.
|
|
In-person
demonstrations that move to multiple sites
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
Select the
option that best describes the policy of the program for charging
individuals with disabilities for a demonstration.
|
|
Nothing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
Select the
option that best describes the policy of the program for charging
professionals for a demonstration.
|
|
Nothing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
Devices in
the demonstration pool also are made available for the following (choose all
that apply).
|
|
Device
loans
|
Yes
|
|
Evaluations
and assessments
|
Yes
|
|
Training
|
Yes
|
|
Public
awareness
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
Select the
option that best describes what is shared with the device loan program.
|
|
Both staff
and space
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
Provide
any additional information about this activity you wish to share.
|
|
The
Assistive Technology Program for the District of Columbia operates an AT
demonstration center known as the District of Columbia Assistive Technology
Resource Center (DCATRC). The DCATRC, which was established in 1999, is
fully accessible and is located in the District of Columbia Rehabilitation
Services Administration (DCRSA) office. The DCATRC is a facility where
consumers, family members, employers, educators, service providers and any District
of Columbia resident may explore, experience and compare the usefulness of
various types of AT equipment, learn about possible product vendors and
other related services; and, discuss their applications for devices or
services. The DCATRC is staffed by an Assistive Technology Specialist (ATS)
who possesses significant expertise in assisting individuals in making
informed choices regarding assistive technology devices and services. Staff
will also be available to provide off-site demonstrations as needed
including demonstrations at the DC Disability Equipment Recycling site.
The ATPDC Program will collaborate with vendors and specialized AT experts
to provide demonstrations of a variety of AT devices that address the needs
of specific disabilities and/or groups within the community, schools, and
worksites. The ATPDC Program will continue to make an effort to expand
Assistive Technology (AT) services to the DC Public Schools. The services
include assist on the selections of assistive technology devices and
educational software as well as the training on the received products
during the IEP.
The DC Assistive Technology staff will make an effort to set up a
fee-for-service system providing evaluation and assessment services for
individuals with disabilities. This will allow consumers to try a variety
of AT devices at the DCATRC to determine the best AT solutions to achieve
success in educational, employment and community living endeavors into the
formal habilitation, education and/or rehabilitation process.
|
|
|
|
|
Page 6 of 10
Assistive Technology State Grant Program
District of Columbia State Plan for FY 2011-2013
G1 State Leadership Activities
Training Activities
|
|
|
|
1
|
Who
conducts this activity? Check all that apply.
|
|
The
Statewide AT Program
|
Yes
|
|
Other
entities (e.g. contractors)
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
The
Statewide AT Program provides and/or receives the following support (choose
all that apply).
|
|
Provides
financial support to other entities via an agreement with the Statewide AT
Program.
|
Yes
|
|
Provides
in-kind support to other entities via an agreement with the Statewide AT
Program.
|
No
|
|
Receives
financial support from the state.
|
No
|
|
Receives
in-kind support from the state.
|
No
|
|
Receives
financial support from private entities.
|
Yes
|
|
Receives
in-kind support from private entities.
|
No
|
|
Coordinates
and collaborates with other entities for the purpose of establishing a new
program or service.
|
Yes
|
|
Coordinates
and collaborates with other entities for the purpose of expanding an
existing program or service.
|
Yes
|
|
Coordinates
and collaborates with other entities for the purpose of reducing
duplication of programs or services.
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
If you
conduct this activity by providing financial or in-kind support to other
entities, identify the kinds of entities you support in column a of the
following table.
|
|
If you
receive financial or in-kind support from the state to conduct this
activity, identify the state entities that provide this support in column b
of the following table.
|
|
If you
receive financial or in-kind support from private entities, identify the
private entities that provide this support in column c of the following
table.
|
|
If you
coordinate and collaborate with other entities in conducting this activity,
identify those entities in column d of the following table.
|
|
Organization
or Activity
|
a. You
provide support
|
b. Receive
support from the state
|
c. Receive
support from these private entities
|
d.
Collaborate with
|
|
AgrAbility Program
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Alliance
for Technology Access Center
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Bank or
other financial institution
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Community
Living agency
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Easter
Seals
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Education-related
agency
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Employment-related
agency
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Health,
allied health, and rehabilitation-related agency
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Independent
Living Center
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Institution
of Higher Education
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Non-categorical
disability organization
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Organization
that primarily serves individuals who are blind or visually impaired
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Organization
that primarily serves individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Organization
that primarily serves individuals with developmental disabilities
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Organization
that primarily serves individuals with physical disabilities
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Organization
focused specifically on providing AT
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Protection
and Advocacy Organization
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Technology
agency
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
UCP
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Other
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
Select the
option that best describes from where this activity is conducted.
|
|
One
central location
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
If you
indicated the use of regional sites, from how many regional sites is the
activity conducted?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
This
activity is available (choose all that apply)
|
|
By website
|
No
|
|
By phone
|
Yes
|
|
By e-mail
|
Yes
|
|
By mail
|
Yes
|
|
In person
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
Select the
option that best describes how training is primarily provided.
|
|
At sites
arranged by those receiving the training
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
Select the
option that best describes the policy of the program for charging
individuals with disabilities for training.
|
|
Nothing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
Select the
option that best describes the policy of the program for charging
professionals for training.
|
|
Nothing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
Provide
any additional information about this activity you wish to share.
|
|
Over the
next three years, the Assistive Technology Program for the District of
Columbia will engage in a number of training activities. ATPDC staff will
develop a number of comprehensive, customized and interactive training
activities to meet the needs of individuals with disabilities, family
members, teachers, school administrators, employers, government agencies
and professional service providers in the District of Columbia. ATPDC
training modules will involve integrating practical experience and
hands-on applications with a discussion of theory and policy as well
as ongoing follow-up and support to reinforce and refresh the content.
ATPDC staff and expert consultants will advertise specific subject training
workshops in local disability related newsletters, and employee
orientation/training schedules of schools and teachers, therapists, and
medical personnel. All training information will be available on the ATPDC
and other disability related organizations website, mass emails, and flyer
distribution during all pubic awareness events.
|
|
|
|
|
Page 7 of 10
Assistive Technology State Grant Program
District of Columbia State Plan for FY 2011-2013
G2 State Leadership Activities
Technical Assistance Activities
|
|
|
|
1
|
Who
conducts this activity? Check all that apply.
|
|
The
Statewide AT Program
|
Yes
|
|
Other
entities (e.g. contractors)
|
No
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
The
Statewide AT Program provides and/or receives the following support (choose
all that apply).
|
|
Provides
financial support to other entities via an agreement with the Statewide AT
Program.
|
No
|
|
Provides
in-kind support to other entities via an agreement with the Statewide AT
Program.
|
No
|
|
Receives
financial support from the state.
|
No
|
|
Receives in-kind
support from the state.
|
No
|
|
Receives
financial support from private entities.
|
No
|
|
Receives
in-kind support from private entities.
|
No
|
|
Coordinates
and collaborates with other entities for the purpose of establishing a new
program or service.
|
Yes
|
|
Coordinates
and collaborates with other entities for the purpose of expanding an
existing program or service.
|
Yes
|
|
Coordinates
and collaborates with other entities for the purpose of reducing
duplication of programs or services.
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
If you
conduct this activity by providing financial or in-kind support to other
entities, identify the kinds of entities you support in column a of the
following table.
|
|
If you
receive financial or in-kind support from the state to conduct this
activity, identify the state entities that provide this support in column b
of the following table.
|
|
If you
receive financial or in-kind support from private entities, identify the
private entities that provide this support in column c of the following
table.
|
|
If you coordinate
and collaborate with other entities in conducting this activity, identify
those entities in column d of the following table.
|
|
Organization
or Activity
|
a. You
provide support
|
b. Receive
support from the state
|
c. Receive
support from these private entities
|
d.
Collaborate with
|
|
AgrAbility Program
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Alliance
for Technology Access Center
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Bank or
other financial institution
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Community
Living agency
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Easter
Seals
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Education-related
agency
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Employment-related
agency
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Health,
allied health, and rehabilitation-related agency
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Independent
Living Center
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Institution
of Higher Education
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Non-categorical
disability organization
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Organization
that primarily serves individuals who are blind or visually impaired
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Organization
that primarily serves individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Organization
that primarily serves individuals with developmental disabilities
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Organization
that primarily serves individuals with physical disabilities
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Organization
focused specifically on providing AT
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Protection
and Advocacy Organization
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Technology
agency
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
UCP
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Other
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
Select the
option that best describes from where this activity is conducted.
|
|
One
central location
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
If you
indicated the use of regional sites, from how many regional sites is the
activity conducted?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
This
activity is available (choose all that apply)
|
|
By website
|
No
|
|
By phone
|
Yes
|
|
By e-mail
|
Yes
|
|
By mail
|
Yes
|
|
In person
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
Select the
option that best describes the policy of the program for charging for
technical assistance.
|
|
Nothing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
Provide
any additional information about this activity you wish to share.
|
|
Over the
next three years, ATPDC staff members will provide technical assistance
(TA) that generally involves advice and consultation on assistive
technology available in the marketplace, proper product application, and
funding, purchase and vendor information. ATPDC program staff will provide
TA to statewide, local and federal government agencies, service providers and
all District of Columbia residents with and without disabilities.
Specifically the ATPDC staff will assist District of Columbia agencies
develop procurement policies and procedures to purchase appropriate AT
devices and services for individuals with disabilities.
|
|
|
|
|
Page 8 of 10
Assistive Technology State Grant Program
District of Columbia State Plan for FY 2011-2013
G3 State Leadership Activities
Public Awareness Activities
|
|
|
|
1
|
Who
conducts this activity? Check all that apply.
|
|
The
Statewide AT Program
|
Yes
|
|
Other
entities (e.g. contractors)
|
No
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
The
Statewide AT Program provides and/or receives the following support (choose
all that apply).
|
|
Provides
financial support to other entities via an agreement with the Statewide AT
Program.
|
No
|
|
Provides
in-kind support to other entities via an agreement with the Statewide AT
Program.
|
No
|
|
Receives
financial support from the state.
|
No
|
|
Receives
in-kind support from the state.
|
No
|
|
Receives
financial support from private entities.
|
No
|
|
Receives
in-kind support from private entities.
|
No
|
|
Coordinates
and collaborates with other entities for the purpose of establishing a new
program or service.
|
Yes
|
|
Coordinates
and collaborates with other entities for the purpose of expanding an
existing program or service.
|
Yes
|
|
Coordinates
and collaborates with other entities for the purpose of reducing
duplication of programs or services.
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
If you
conduct this activity by providing financial or in-kind support to other
entities, identify the kinds of entities you support in column a of the
following table.
|
|
If you
receive financial or in-kind support from the state to conduct this
activity, identify the state entities that provide this support in column b
of the following table.
|
|
If you
receive financial or in-kind support from private entities, identify the
private entities that provide this support in column c of the following
table.
|
|
If you
coordinate and collaborate with other entities in conducting this activity,
identify those entities in column d of the following table.
|
|
Organization
or Activity
|
a. You
provide support
|
b. Receive
support from the state
|
c. Receive
support from these private entities
|
d.
Collaborate with
|
|
AgrAbility Program
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Alliance
for Technology Access Center
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Bank or
other financial institution
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Community
Living agency
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Easter
Seals
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Education-related
agency
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Employment-related
agency
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Health,
allied health, and rehabilitation-related agency
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Independent
Living Center
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Institution
of Higher Education
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Non-categorical
disability organization
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Organization
that primarily serves individuals who are blind or visually impaired
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Organization
that primarily serves individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Organization
that primarily serves individuals with developmental disabilities
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Organization
that primarily serves individuals with physical disabilities
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Organization
focused specifically on providing AT
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Protection
and Advocacy Organization
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Technology
agency
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
UCP
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Other
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
Select the
option that best describes from where this activity is conducted.
|
|
One
central location
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
If you
indicated the use of regional sites, from how many regional sites is the
activity conducted?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
This
activity is available (choose all that apply)
|
|
By website
|
Yes
|
|
By phone
|
Yes
|
|
By e-mail
|
Yes
|
|
By mail
|
Yes
|
|
In person
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
Describe
the activity.
|
|
The
Assistive Technology Program for the District of Columbia (ATPDC) uses a
multifaceted approach that includes mailings, website, publications, public
service announcements, local cable TV advertising, and participation with
other agencies, conferences, exhibits, presentations, and trainings to
increase awareness of the benefits of AT devices and services. ATPDC staff
provides information on the availability, benefits, appropriateness and
cost of AT devices and services upon request. We respond to numerous
telephone calls, e-mail messages, letters and other inquiries each quarter
from consumers, service providers and others interested in learning about
assistive technology and our program. ATPDC submits articles related to AT
to other community disability-related organizations, publications and
newsletters. Our staff members are visible throughout the city at exhibits
and conferences. We also conduct presentations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 9 of 10
Assistive Technology State Grant Program
District of Columbia State Plan for FY 2011-2013
G4 State Leadership Activities
Information and Assistance
Activities
|
|
|
|
1
|
Who
conducts this activity? Check all that apply.
|
|
The
Statewide AT Program
|
Yes
|
|
Other
entities (e.g. contractors)
|
No
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
The
Statewide AT Program provides and/or receives the following support (choose
all that apply).
|
|
Provides
financial support to other entities via an agreement with the Statewide AT
Program.
|
No
|
|
Provides
in-kind support to other entities via an agreement with the Statewide AT
Program.
|
No
|
|
Receives
financial support from the state.
|
No
|
|
Receives
in-kind support from the state.
|
No
|
|
Receives
financial support from private entities.
|
No
|
|
Receives
in-kind support from private entities.
|
No
|
|
Coordinates
and collaborates with other entities for the purpose of establishing a new
program or service.
|
No
|
|
Coordinates
and collaborates with other entities for the purpose of expanding an
existing program or service.
|
Yes
|
|
Coordinates
and collaborates with other entities for the purpose of reducing
duplication of programs or services.
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
If you
conduct this activity by providing financial or in-kind support to other
entities, identify the kinds of entities you support in column a of the
following table.
|
|
If you
receive financial or in-kind support from the state to conduct this
activity, identify the state entities that provide this support in column b
of the following table.
|
|
If you
receive financial or in-kind support from private entities, identify the
private entities that provide this support in column c of the following
table.
|
|
If you
coordinate and collaborate with other entities in conducting this activity,
identify those entities in column d of the following table.
|
|
Organization
or Activity
|
a. You
provide support
|
b. Receive
support from the state
|
c. Receive
support from these private entities
|
d.
Collaborate with
|
|
AgrAbility Program
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Alliance
for Technology Access Center
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Bank or
other financial institution
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Community
Living agency
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Easter
Seals
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Education-related
agency
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Employment-related
agency
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Health,
allied health, and rehabilitation-related agency
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Independent
Living Center
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Institution
of Higher Education
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Non-categorical
disability organization
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Organization
that primarily serves individuals who are blind or visually impaired
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Organization
that primarily serves individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Organization
that primarily serves individuals with developmental disabilities
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Organization
that primarily serves individuals with physical disabilities
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Organization
focused specifically on providing AT
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Protection
and Advocacy Organization
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Technology
agency
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
UCP
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Other
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
Select the
option that best describes from where this activity is conducted.
|
|
One
central location
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
If you
indicated the use of regional sites, from how many regional sites is the
activity conducted?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
This
activity is available (choose all that apply)
|
|
By website
|
Yes
|
|
By phone
|
Yes
|
|
By e-mail
|
Yes
|
|
By mail
|
Yes
|
|
In person
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
Describe
the activity.
|
|
AT Program
staff produced fact sheets and posters that can be produced in-house and
customized to allow flexibility in outreaching specific audiences and
organizations. ATPDC developed one page flyers to inform the public about
the services of the AT program instead of brochures. A poster highlighting
individuals with disabilities using assistive technology devices with the
tag line Got a Disability- Use Creative Solutions for Living was also
developed. The ATPDC will continue its efforts to increase access and
acquisition of AT devices by providing public awareness, information and referral
services, technical assistance, and customized training on AT issues.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 10 of 10
Assistive Technology State Grant Program
District of Columbia State Plan for FY 2009-2011 (submitted FY
2010)
|
|
Section H: Assurances and Signature
|
|
|
|
1
|
As Certifying Representative
of the Lead Agency for the District of Columbia, I hereby assure the
following.
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
The Lead Agency prepared and
submitted this State Plan on behalf of the District of Columbia.
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
The Lead Agency submitting
this plan is the State agency that is eligible to submit this plan.
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
The State agency has
authority under State law to perform the functions of the State under this
program.
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
The State legally may carry
out each provision of this plan.
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
All provisions of this plan
are consistent with State law.
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
A State officer, specified by
title in this certification, has authority under State law to receive,
hold, and disburse Federal funds made available under the plan.
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
The State officer who submits
this plan, specified by title in this certification, has authority to
submit this plan.
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
The agency that submits this
plan has adopted or otherwise formally approved this plan.
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
The plan is the basis for
State operation and administration of the program.
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
The Lead Agency will maintain
and evaluate the program under this State Plan.
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
The State will annually
collect data related to the required activities implemented by the State
under this section in order to prepare the progress reports required under
subsection 4(f) of the Act.
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
The Lead Agency will submit
the progress report on behalf of the State.
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
The State will prepare
reports to the Secretary in such form and containing such information as
the Secretary may require to carry out the Secretary's functions under this
Act and keep such records and allow access to such records as the Secretary
may require to ensure the correctness and verification of information
provided to the Secretary.
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
The Lead Agency will control
and administer the funds received through the grant.
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
The Lead Agency will make
programmatic and resource allocation decisions necessary to implement the
State Plan.
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
Funds received through the
grant will be expended in accordance with Section 4 of the Act, and will be
used to supplement, and not supplant, funds available from other sources
for technology-related assistance, including the provision of assistive
technology devices and assistive technology services.
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
The Lead Agency will ensure
conformance with Federal and State accounting requirements.
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
The State will adopt such
fiscal control and accounting procedures as may be necessary to ensure
proper disbursement of and accounting for the funds received through the
grant.
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
Funds made available through
a grant to a State under this Act will not be used for direct payment for
an assistive technology device for an individual with a disability.
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
A public agency or an
individual with a disability holds title to any property purchased with
funds received under the grant and administers that property.
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
The physical facility of the
Lead Agency and Implementing Entity, if any, meets the requirements of the
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq.) regarding
accessibility for individuals with disabilities. Section 4(d)(6)(E)
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
Activities carried out in the
State that are authorized under this Act, and supported by Federal funds
received under this Act, will comply with the standards established by the
Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board under section
508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (20 U.S.C. 794d). Section 4(d)(6)(G)
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
The Lead Agency will
coordinate the activities of the State Plan among public and private
entities, including coordinating efforts related to entering into
interagency agreements.
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
The Lead Agency will
coordinate efforts related to the active, timely, and meaningful
participation by individuals with disabilities and their family members,
guardians, advocates, or authorized representatives, and other appropriate
individuals, with respect to activities carried out through the grant.
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
Describe how your program
will conform to section 427 of General Education Provisions Act by
describing the steps you propose to take to ensure equitable access to, and
participation in, your program for students, teachers, and other program
beneficiaries with special needs.
|
|
|
The
District of Columbia Department on Disability Services, Rehabilitation
Services Administration (DC RSA) will take all the necessary steps to
ensure equitable access to, and participation in, all programs and services
provided by DC Rehabilitation Services Administration as described in the
State Plan for Assistive Technology. All partners and subcontractors will
comply with the GEPA (General Education Provisions Act), section 427.
Specifically, DC RSA will ensure equitable access regardless of gender,
race, national origin, color, disability or age and will implement the
following activities to address potential access barriers.
1) All print materials will be available in alternative formats (e.g.
Braille, large print, electronic text, and audio) and available in
languages other than English as needed. Materials will be developed with
due consideration of cultural diversity issues along with literacy demands
and other factors critical to ensuring usability by a diverse audience.
2) All meetings or events will be held in facilities that comply with the
Americans with Disabilities Act Architectural Guidelines and communication
accommodations (e.g. real time captioning, sign language interpreters,
other language interpreters, etc.) will be provided as needed.
3) We will ensure that web sites are accessible to ensure accessibility to
a wide variety of individuals with diverse information processing needs.
4) We will systemically targeted our public awareness efforts to groups and
individuals that are underserved that live in areas of the city that are
geographically and economically distant from services that provide access
and acquisition of assistive technology devices and services.
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
Access
Goal Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Access
|
Education
|
Employment
|
Community Living
|
IT/Telecomm
|
|
a.
Long-term Goal
|
80.00
|
80.00
|
90.00
|
50.00
|
|
b.
Long-term Goal Status
|
Not met
|
Not met
|
Not met
|
Not met
|
|
c. FY 2007
Performance
|
100.00
|
100.00
|
100.00
|
100.00
|
|
d. FY 2008
Short-term goal
|
80.00
|
80.00
|
90.00
|
50.00
|
|
e. FY 2008
Performance
|
85.53
|
88.17
|
91.30
|
0.00
|
|
f. FY 2008
Status
|
Met
|
Met
|
Met
|
Not met
|
|
g. FY 2009
Short-term goal
|
80.00
|
80.00
|
90.00
|
50.00
|
|
h. FY 2009
Performance
|
90.91
|
90.16
|
69.23
|
100.00
|
|
i. FY 2009 Status
|
Met
|
Met
|
Not met
|
Met
|
|
j. FY 2010
Short-term goal
|
80.00
|
80.00
|
90.00
|
50.00
|
|
k. FY 2010
Performance
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
|
l. FY 2010
Status
|
Not met
|
Not met
|
Not met
|
Not met
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
Acquisition
Goal Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
|
Education
|
Employment
|
Community Living
|
|
a.
Long-term Goal
|
75.00
|
75.00
|
90.00
|
|
b.
Long-term Goal Status
|
Not met
|
Not met
|
Not met
|
|
c. FY 2007
Performance
|
100.00
|
100.00
|
100.00
|
|
d. FY 2008
Short-term goal
|
75.00
|
75.00
|
90.00
|
|
e. FY 2008
Performance
|
100.00
|
91.67
|
99.49
|
|
f. FY 2008
Status
|
Met
|
Met
|
Met
|
|
g. FY 2009
Short-term goal
|
75.00
|
75.00
|
90.00
|
|
h. FY 2009
Performance
|
99.26
|
69.57
|
99.83
|
|
i. FY 2009 Status
|
Met
|
Not met
|
Met
|
|
j. FY 2010
Short-term goal
|
75.00
|
75.00
|
90.00
|
|
k. FY 2010
Performance
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
|
l. FY 2010
Status
|
Not met
|
Not met
|
Not met
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
Name of
Certifying Representative for the Lead Agency
|
Roy Albert
|
|
|
|
30
|
Title of
Certifying Representative for the Lead Agency
|
Deputy
Director of the Rehabilitation Services Administration
|
|
|
|
31
|
Signed?
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
32
|
Date
Signed
|
01/16/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are
required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid
OMB control number. The valid OMB control number of this information collection
is 1820-0664. The time required to complete this information collection is
estimated to average 75 hours per response, including the time to review
instructions, search existing data sources, gather the data needed, and
complete and review the information collection. If you have any comments
concerning the accuracy of the time estimate or suggestions for improving this
form, please write to: U.S. Department of Education, Washington, D.C.
20202-4760. If you have any comments or concerns regarding the status of your
individual submission of this form, write directly to: Robert Groenendaal.