Assistive Technology State Grant Program

District of Columbia State Plan for FY 2009-2011 (submitted FY 2010)

Table of Contents

 

Page 1

A

Identification and Description of Lead Agency and Implementing Entity; Change in Lead Agency or Implementing Entity

 

Page 2

B

Advisory Council, Budget Allocations, and Identification of Activities Conducted

 

C

State Financing Activities

Financial loan program

N/A

Access to telework loan fund

N/A

Cooperative buying program

N/A

Financing for home modifications program

N/A

Telecommunications distribution program

N/A

Last resort program

N/A

Other program

N/A

 

D

Device Reutilization Activities

Device exchange

N/A

Page 3

Device reassignment

 

Page 4

E

Device Loan Activity

 

Page 5

F

Device Demonstration Activity

 

G

State Leadership Activities

Page 6

Training Activities

Page 7

Technical Assistance Activities

Page 8

Public Awareness Activities

Page 9

Information and Assistance Activities

 

Page 10

H

Assurances and Signatures

 

Page 1 of 10

Assistive Technology State Grant Program

District of Columbia State Plan for FY 2009-2011 (submitted FY 2010)

Section A. Identification and Description of Lead Agency and Implementing Entity; Change in Lead Agency or Implementing Entity

 

1

Name Given to Statewide AT Program.

Assistive Technology Program for the District of Columbia

 

2

Website dedicated to Statewide AT Program

http://www.atpdc.org

 

3

Name and Address of Lead Agency

District of Columbia Department on Disability Services Rehabilitation Services Administration
810 First Street, N.E. 10th Floor
Washington, DC 20002

 

4

Name, Title, and Contact Information for Lead Agency Certifying Representative.

Roy Albert
Deputy Director of the Rehabilitation Services Administration (DC RSA)
810 First Street, N.E.
Washington, DC 20002
Roy.Albert@dc.gov
(202) 442-8663

 

5

Information about Program Director at Lead Agency.

Roy Albert
Deputy Director of the Rehabilitation Services Administration (DC RSA)
810 First Street, N.E.
Washington, DC 20002
Roy.Albert@dc.gov
(202) 442-8663

 

6

Information about Program Contact(s) at Lead Agency.

Roy Albert
Deputy Director of the Rehabilitation Services Administration (DC RSA)
810 First Street, N.E.
Washington, DC 20002
Roy.Albert@dc.gov

 

7

Telephone at Lead Agency for Public.

202-442-8663

 

8

E-mail at Lead Agency for Public.

Roy.Albert@dc.gov

 

9

Select the most appropriate descriptor of the agency/division/bureau directly responsible for the Statewide AT Program within the Lead Agency.

General or Combined Vocational Rehabilitation Agency

 

10

If Other was selected for question 9, identify and describe the agency.

 

11

Does your Lead Agency contract with an Implementing Entity to carry out the Statewide AT Program on its behalf?

Yes

 

If you answered no to question 11, you may skip ahead to the next page. Otherwise, you must answer the following questions.

 

12

Name and Address of Implementing Entity.

University Legal Services
220 I Street, N.E., Suite 130
Washington, DC 20002

 

13

Information about Program Director at the Implementing Entity.

Jane Brown
Executive Director
University Legal Services
220 I Street, N.E., Suite 130
Washington, DC 20002
jbrown@uls-dc.org

 

14

Information about Program Contact(s) at Implementing Entity.

Alicia C. Johns
Program Manager
Assistive Technology Program for the District of Columbia
220 I Street, N.E., Suite 130
Washington, DC 20002
ajohns@uls-dc.org

 

15

Telephone at Implementing Entity for Public.

202-547-0198

 

16

E-mail at Implementing Entity for Public.

advocacy@uls-dc.org

 

17

Select the most appropriate descriptor of the type of organization that is the Implementing Entity.

Protection and Advocacy organization

 

18

If Other was selected, identify and describe the entity.

 

19

Describe the mechanisms established to ensure coordination of activities and collaboration between the Implementing Entity and the state.

The Implementing Entity, University Legal Services will enter into a contract with the District of Columbias Lead Agency (the District of Columbia Department Department on Disability Services Rehabilitation Services Administration or DC RSA). This contract will set forth activities that ATPDC must conduct on behalf of DC RSA and the system oversight to be provided by the U.S. Department of Education. A DC RSA Project Officer will oversee administration of the contract, and the Program Manager of ATPDC will meet quarterly with this Project Officer to discuss activities and the implementation of this state plan.

The Project Officer or designee will attend all Advisory Council meetings for ATPDC, while the ATPDC Program Manager will serve on the advisory committee to DC RSA. ATPDC will submit monthly expenditures reports to the DC RSA Administrator for review and appropriate assistance to ATPDC. ATPDC will also provide quarterly and annual reports to DC RSA on activities completed, activities planned, and any data related those activities.

 

20

Is the Lead Agency named in this State Plan a new or different Lead Agency from the one designated by the Governor in your previous State Plan?

Yes

 

If you answered no to question 20, you may skip ahead to the next page. Otherwise, you must answer the following questions.

 

21

Explain why the Lead Agency previously designated by your state should not serve as the Lead Agency.

In 1993 Mayor Sharon Pratt Kelly designated the District of Columbia Department of Human Services, Rehabilitation Services Administration (RSA), the state vocational rehabilitation program, as the lead agency for the Statewide Assistive Technology Program for the District of Columbia (ATPDC). The mission of the ATPDC is to increase the provision of, access to, and funding for assistive technology for residents of the District of Columbia with disabilities through a variety of District-wide, comprehensive activities and services. Since
1998, University Legal Services (ULS) has been directly responsible for the ATPDC.

In April, 2007 Mayor Adrian Fenty named Judith E. Heumann, a widely recognized leader inthe disability rights movement both in the US and throughout the world, to be the first director of the District of Columbia Department on Disability Services (DDS). The mission of the new Department on Disability Services is to provide innovative, high quality services that enable people with disabilities to lead meaningful and productive lives as vital members of their families, schools, workplaces and communities in every neighborhood in the District of
Columbia. Currently, it provides services to more than 10,000 residents with disabilities through its two administrations: Developmental Disabilities Administration (DDA) that enables
people with intellectual and developmental disabilities to live meaningful and productive lives in our community; and, Rehabilitation Services Administration (DC RSA) that offers training and vocational rehabilitation services aimed at assisting people with disabilities to prepare for and retain employment.

 

22

Explain why the Lead Agency newly designated by your state should not serve as the Lead Agency.

 

23

Is the Implementing Entity named in this State Plan a new or different Implementing Entity from the one designated by the Governor in your previous State Plan?

No

 

If you answered no or not applicable to question 23, you may skip ahead to the next page. Otherwise, you must answer the following questions.

 

24

Explain why the Implementing Entity previously designated by your state should not serve as the Implementing Entity.

 

25

Explain why the Implementing Entity newly designated by your state should serve as the Implementing Entity

 

 

Page 2 of 10

Assistive Technology State Grant Program

District of Columbia State Plan for FY 2009-2011 (submitted FY 2010)

Section B: Advisory Council, Budget Allocations, and Identification of Activities Conducted

NOTE: You MUST answer questions 13 and 14 in order to set up the rest of your form.

 

1

In accordance with section 4(c)(2) of the AT Act of 1998, as amended our state has a consumer-majority advisory council that provides consumer-responsive, consumer-driven advice to the state for planning of, implementation of, and evaluation of the activities carried out through the grant, including setting measurable goals. This advisory council is geographically representative of the State and reflects the diversity of the State with respect to race, ethnicity, types of disabilities across the age span, and users of types of services that an individual with a disability may receive.

Yes

 

2

The advisory council includes a representative of the designated State agency, as defined in section 7 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 705)

Yes

 

3

The advisory council includes a representative of the State agency for individuals who are blind (within the meaning of section 101 of that Act (29 U.S.C. 721));

N/A

 

4

The advisory council includes a representative of a State center for independent living described in part C of title VII of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 796f et seq.);

Yes

 

5

The advisory council includes a representative of the State workforce investment board established under section 111 of the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (29 U.S.C. 2821);

Yes

 

6

The advisory council includes a representative of the State educational agency, as defined in section 9101 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965

Yes

 

7

The advisory council includes other representatives (list below)

The membership of the Assistive Technology Program for the District of Columbia Advisory Council includes representation from seven of the eight Wards in the District of Columbia. The Advisory Council reflects the racial and ethnic diversity of the city. Members use a variety of assistive technology devices, such as mobility devices, augmentative communication devices, devices and software for individuals who are blind and computer adaptations.

The individuals with disabilities include an Adjunct Professor at Howard University and the University of the District of Columbia who teaches two courses in technology/multimedia technology and conducts training workshops on assistive technology and Smart Classes; an attorney who provides advocacy and legal counsel to individuals with and without disabilities through her private law practice; a member who works for the Library of Congress, National Library Service for the Blind and Physically Handicapped; University Legal Services Supervising Housing Counselor; and parent with child with intellectural disabilities. The advisory council membership also includes a representative from the Children's National Medical Center Transition Services, Division of Pediatric Rehabilitation.

 

8

The advisory council includes the following number of individuals with disabilities that use assistive technology or their family members or guardians:

6

 

9

If the Statewide AT Program does not have the composition and representation required under section 4(c)(2)(B), explain below.

 

10

Proposed Budget Allocations

State-level Activities

Proposed Budget Allocation for Entire Annual Award

State Financing Activities

Not performed due to flexibility

Device Reutilization Activities

more than $100,000

Device Loan Activity

$30,001-$40,000

Device Demonstration Activity

$70,001-$80,000

State Leadership Activities

$90,001-$100,000

 

11

For every activity for which you selected "claiming comparability" in item 10, describe the comparable activity.

 

12

Describe your planned procedures for tracking expenditures for State-level and State Leadership activities.

All programs of University Legal Services (ULS) use the same Microsoft Information Product (MIP) accounting system to record and track expenditures and revenue. A coding system has been developed within MIP to enable detailed accounting by contract or grant and type of expenditure. ULS will use MIP to code and track expenditures as State Level and State Leadership Activities accordingly. At any time, a report can be obtained to monitor expenditures to assure that the AT Program for the District of Columbia is in compliance with the percentages and budget amounts specified in the State Plan. The ATPDC Program Manager will be responsible for monitoring expenditures on a monthly basis. The Assistive Technology Program for the District of Columbia will exercise flexibility regarding the financial activities for this state plan. Our proposed budget allocations will be State-level Activities 70% and State Leadership Activities 30%.

 

13

State Financing Activities Performed

State Financing Activities

Activities Performed
(select all that apply)

Financial loan program

Access to telework loan fund

Cooperative buying program

Financing for home modifications program

Telecommunications distribution program

Last resort program

Other program


 

 

Other Activities Performed

Device Reutilization, Device Loan, and Device Demonstration Activities

Number of Activities Performed

How many device exchange programs do you support?

0

How many device reassignment programs do you support?

1

How many device loan programs do you support?

1

How many device demonstration programs do you support?

1

 

14

What is the baseline year for the measurable goals for this state plan?

2007

 

 

Page 3 of 10

Assistive Technology State Grant Program

District of Columbia State Plan for FY 2011-2013
D Device Reutilization Activities

Device Reassignment (1 of 1)

 

1

Select the option that best describes the reassignment program

reassigns general AT

 

2

Enter the year when the program began conducting this activity.

1998

 

3

Who conducts this activity? Check all that apply.

The Statewide AT Program

Yes

Other entities (e.g. contractors)

Yes

 

4

The Statewide AT Program provides and/or receives the following support (choose all that apply).

Provides financial support to other entities via an agreement with the Statewide AT Program.

Yes

Provides in-kind support to other entities via an agreement with the Statewide AT Program.

No

Receives financial support from the state.

No

Receives in-kind support from the state.

No

Receives financial support from private entities.

No

Receives in-kind support from private entities.

Yes

Coordinates and collaborates with other entities for the purpose of establishing a new program or service.

No

Coordinates and collaborates with other entities for the purpose of expanding an existing program or service.

Yes

Coordinates and collaborates with other entities for the purpose of reducing duplication of programs or services.

Yes

 


 

5

If you conduct this activity by providing financial or in-kind support to other entities, identify the kinds of entities you support in column a of the following table.

If you receive financial or in-kind support from the state to conduct this activity, identify the state entities that provide this support in column b of the following table.

If you receive financial or in-kind support from private entities, identify the private entities that provide this support in column c of the following table.

If you coordinate and collaborate with other entities in conducting this activity, identify those entities in column d of the following table.

Organization or Activity

a. You provide support

b. Receive support from the state

c. Receive support from these private entities

d. Collaborate with

AgrAbility Program

No

No

No

No

Alliance for Technology Access Center

No

No

No

No

Bank or other financial institution

No

No

No

No

Community Living agency

No

No

Yes

Yes

Easter Seals

No

No

No

No

Education-related agency

No

No

No

No

Employment-related agency

No

No

No

No

Health, allied health, and rehabilitation-related agency

No

No

No

No

Independent Living Center

No

No

No

No

Institution of Higher Education

No

No

No

No

Non-categorical disability organization

No

No

No

No

Organization that primarily serves individuals who are blind or visually impaired

No

No

No

No

Organization that primarily serves individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing

No

No

No

No

Organization that primarily serves individuals with developmental disabilities

No

No

No

No

Organization that primarily serves individuals with physical disabilities

No

No

No

No

Organization focused specifically on providing AT

No

No

No

No

Protection and Advocacy Organization

No

No

Yes

Yes

Technology agency

No

No

No

No

UCP

No

No

No

No

Other

No

No

No

No

 

6

Select the option that best describes from where this activity is conducted.

One central location

 

7

If you indicated the use of regional sites, from how many regional sites is the activity conducted?

 

8

This activity is available (choose all that apply)

By website

No

By phone

Yes

By e-mail

Yes

By mail

Yes

In person

Yes

 

9

Select the option that best describes the policy of the program for charging individuals with disabilities for a device.

Nothing

 

10

Select the option that best describes the policy of the program for charging professionals for a device.

Nothing

 

11

How do you get the device to the consumer?

The consumer picks up the device at a designated site

 

12

In the following table, select by device type how the device is reassigned. Select the top two used by the program.

Type of device

Based on consumer choice and/or request

A professional recommendation is required

Qualified program staff match it to the consumer

Qualified consultants and/or volunteers match it to the consumer

The device is provided through a qualified third-party

Not applicable - this type of device is not made available

Vision

Yes

No

Yes

No

No

No

Hearing

Yes

No

Yes

No

No

No

Speech Communication

Yes

No

Yes

No

No

Yes

Learning, Cognition, and Developmental

No

No

No

No

No

Yes

Mobility, Seating, and Positioning

Yes

No

Yes

No

No

No

Daily Living

Yes

No

Yes

No

No

No

Environmental Adaptations

Yes

No

Yes

No

No

No

Vehicle Modification and Transportation

No

No

No

No

No

Yes

Recreation, Sports, and Leisure Equipment

Yes

No

Yes

No

No

No

Computer and Associated Equipment

Yes

No

Yes

No

No

No

13

If applicable, describe how consumers demonstrate the need for devices.

The majority of consumers are referred by social workers, clinicians, therapists and other community organizations. All recipients are required to complete a loan agreement which includes information about their diagnosed condition(s) and physician contact information.

14

Describe any supports provided to the consumer to ensure successful use of the device.

Staff provides on-site training on the use of the equipment as per manufacturers guidelines and consumers agreements in writing to consult with professional health providers (PTs, OTs, personal physicians) to determine the suitability and fit of the equipment.

15

If this is an open-ended loan program, describe it.

16

Provide any additional information about this activity you wish to share.

Over the next three years, AT Program for the District of Columbia will collaborate with The Washington Area Wheelchair Society, Independent Living for the Handicapped (ILH), state, federal and other local community organizations including churches, civic, volunteer, professional organizations, community volunteer groups, corporations and other relevant organizations to expand the statewide equipment recycling program. This program known as the District of Columbia Disability Equipment Recycling Program (DC Shares) will increase acquisition of AT by providing new and used assistive technology devices and Durable Medical Equipment (DME) to District of Columbia residents who are in need. DC Shares will not require an eligibility requirement. Anyone needing equipment and unable to acquire it through Medicaid, Medicare, vocational rehabilitation, or special education can use the program to acquire the equipment they need. This new and used equipment is available at no cost for District of Columbia residents with disabilities or those who have a dependent with a disability, regardless of their type of disability, age, income level or location of residence within the city or the type of assistive technology. DC Shares receives supplementing funding under the AT Reuse Demonstration Grant from the U.S. Department of Education, Rehabilitation Services Administration. This additional funding has allowed the Equipment Recycling Program to provide more recycled equipment including computers to more undeserved individuals with disabilities.

 


 

Page 4 of 10

Assistive Technology State Grant Program

District of Columbia State Plan for FY 2011-2013
E Device Loan Activity (1 of 1)

 

1

Select the option that best describes the type of program.

General program

 

2

If you indicated that you have a device loan program for targeted consumers or devices, describe the specific types of consumers or devices for whom this device loan program is intended and why.

 

3

If you indicated that you have a device loan program for targeted agencies or entities, identify the entity or agency and describe the purpose of the program.

 

4

If you selected other, describe

 

5

Enter the year when the program began conducting this activity.

2002

 

6

Who conducts this activity? Check all that apply.

The Statewide AT Program

Yes

Other entities (e.g. contractors)

No

 

7

The Statewide AT Program provides and/or receives the following support (choose all that apply).

Provides financial support to other entities via an agreement with the Statewide AT Program.

No

Provides in-kind support to other entities via an agreement with the Statewide AT Program.

No

Receives financial support from the state.

No

Receives in-kind support from the state.

No

Receives financial support from private entities.

No

Receives in-kind support from private entities.

No

Coordinates and collaborates with other entities for the purpose of establishing a new program or service.

Yes

Coordinates and collaborates with other entities for the purpose of expanding an existing program or service.

Yes

Coordinates and collaborates with other entities for the purpose of reducing duplication of programs or services.

Yes

 

8

If you conduct this activity by providing financial or in-kind support to other entities, identify the kinds of entities you support in column a of the following table.

If you receive financial or in-kind support from the state to conduct this activity, identify the state entities that provide this support in column b of the following table.

If you receive financial or in-kind support from private entities, identify the private entities that provide this support in column c of the following table.

If you coordinate and collaborate with other entities in conducting this activity, identify those entities in column d of the following table.

Organization or Activity

a. You provide support

b. Receive support from the state

c. Receive support from these private entities

d. Collaborate with

AgrAbility Program

No

No

No

No

Alliance for Technology Access Center

No

No

No

No

Bank or other financial institution

No

No

No

No

Community Living agency

No

No

No

No

Easter Seals

No

No

No

No

Education-related agency

No

No

No

No

Employment-related agency

No

No

No

No

Health, allied health, and rehabilitation-related agency

No

No

No

No

Independent Living Center

No

No

No

No

Institution of Higher Education

No

No

No

No

Non-categorical disability organization

No

No

No

No

Organization that primarily serves individuals who are blind or visually impaired

No

No

No

No

Organization that primarily serves individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing

No

No

No

No

Organization that primarily serves individuals with developmental disabilities

No

No

No

No

Organization that primarily serves individuals with physical disabilities

No

No

No

No

Organization focused specifically on providing AT

No

No

No

No

Protection and Advocacy Organization

No

No

No

No

Technology agency

No

No

No

No

UCP

No

No

No

No

Other

No

No

No

Yes

 

9

Select the option that best describes from where this activity is conducted.

One central location

 

10

If you indicated the use of regional sites, from how many regional sites is the activity conducted?

 

11

This activity is available (choose all that apply)

By website

Yes

By phone

Yes

By e-mail

Yes

By mail

No

In person

Yes

 

12

Select the option that best describes the policy of the program for charging individuals with disabilities for a loan.

Nothing

 

13

Select the option that best describes the policy of the program for charging professionals for a loan.

Nothing

 

14

Describe any supports provided to the consumer to ensure a successful loan.

Borrowers are able to call and receive information about available devices and then visit the DCATRC to pick up the device(s) they wish to use. The manufacturers instructions or a quick reference sheet will be available upon request. Shipment of the devices within the city is available for a nominal charge. Borrowers are required to complete an application which outlines the responsibility of the device loan equipment. Loans are generally limited to a maximum of five devices at a time, and the term of the loan will be for up to a four week period, with extensions available upon request.

 

15

Devices in the load pool also are made available for the following (choose all that apply).

Device demonstrations

Yes

Evaluations and assessments

Yes

Training

Yes

Public awareness

Yes

 

16

How do you get the device to the consumer?

The consumer picks up the device at a designated site

 

17

Provide any additional information about this activity you wish to share.

The Assistive Technology Program for the District of Columbia (ATPDC) will operate a short-term AT equipment loan program, Device Loan Program through the DC Assistive Technology Resource Center. The equipment that can be borrowed is limited because the DC AT Resource Center uses the same assistive technology devices to conduct demonstrations. The Device Loan Program assists individuals with disabilities and professionals in decision making before the purchase of the equipment, accommodates interim needs for device repair or funding, and other purposes such as self-education and training by clinicians to use a device to assess clients. Federal and local government agencies representatives borrow AT devices from this program to provide training and demonstrations to their employers and employees about the benefits of AT devices in the work environment. The Device Loan Program includes devices for individuals with visual, speech, hearing, physical, and mobility impairments

During the next three years the Device Loan Program will implement the following strategies on an ongoing basis to broaden the loan programs usefulness to individuals with disabilities:

1)The Device Loan Program will continue to upgrade the outdated equipment by partnerships with vendors and seek additional funding from government and private organizations and will increase inventory by purchasing AT devices and educational software, which are not only to support for adults in postsecondary education but also for K-12 students. Due to reduced funding for all AT Programs, APTDC will purchase some of the most requested devices depending on funding availability. The AT Program for Washington, DC will refer customers to other assistive technology programs in the District of Columbia that may have a larger inventory of more current assistive technology devices and software.

2) AT program staff will solicit donations of assistive technology devices from local and national assistive technology vendors for both demonstration and device loan programs to increase the inventory of equipment that individuals can borrow from the Equipment Loan Program that will meet specific needs for individuals with disabilities.

3)The AT Program for DC (ATPDC) will market the device loan program through flyers distributed to disability-related agencies and organizations, on the ATPDC web site and through ATPDC public awareness activities and subsequent word of mouth by users. ATPDC will advertise the Device Loan Program in local community newspapers targeting their technology or health sections, list the program on various free classified web pages, post our services using podcasting and blogging sites, and distribute the program flyers to local employment agencies like one stop centers and public libraries.

 


 

Page 5 of 10

Assistive Technology State Grant Program

District of Columbia State Plan for FY 2011-2013
F Device Demonstration Activity (1 of 1)

 

1

Select the option that best describes the type of program.

General program

 

2

If you indicated that you have a device demonstration program for targeted consumers or devices, describe the specific types of consumers or devices for whom this device demonstration program is intended and why.

 

3

If you indicated that you have a device demonstration program for targeted agencies or entities, identify the entity or agency and describe the purpose of the program.

 

4

If you selected other, describe

 

5

Enter the year when the program began conducting this activity.

1999

 

6

Who conducts this activity? Check all that apply.

The Statewide AT Program

Yes

Other entities (e.g. contractors)

No

 

7

The Statewide AT Program provides and/or receives the following support (choose all that apply).

Provides financial support to other entities via an agreement with the Statewide AT Program.

No

Provides in-kind support to other entities via an agreement with the Statewide AT Program.

No

Receives financial support from the state.

No

Receives in-kind support from the state.

Yes

Receives financial support from private entities.

No

Receives in-kind support from private entities.

Yes

Coordinates and collaborates with other entities for the purpose of establishing a new program or service.

Yes

Coordinates and collaborates with other entities for the purpose of expanding an existing program or service.

Yes

Coordinates and collaborates with other entities for the purpose of reducing duplication of programs or services.

Yes

 

8

If you conduct this activity by providing financial or in-kind support to other entities, identify the kinds of entities you support in column a of the following table.

If you receive financial or in-kind support from the state to conduct this activity, identify the state entities that provide this support in column b of the following table.

If you receive financial or in-kind support from private entities, identify the private entities that provide this support in column c of the following table.

If you coordinate and collaborate with other entities in conducting this activity, identify those entities in column d of the following table.

Organization or Activity

a. You provide support

b. Receive support from the state

c. Receive support from these private entities

d. Collaborate with

AgrAbility Program

No

No

No

No

Alliance for Technology Access Center

No

No

No

No

Bank or other financial institution

No

No

No

No

Community Living agency

No

No

No

No

Easter Seals

No

No

No

No

Education-related agency

No

No

No

Yes

Employment-related agency

No

No

No

Yes

Health, allied health, and rehabilitation-related agency

No

No

No

Yes

Independent Living Center

No

No

No

Yes

Institution of Higher Education

No

No

No

Yes

Non-categorical disability organization

No

No

No

No

Organization that primarily serves individuals who are blind or visually impaired

No

No

No

Yes

Organization that primarily serves individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing

No

No

No

No

Organization that primarily serves individuals with developmental disabilities

No

No

No

Yes

Organization that primarily serves individuals with physical disabilities

No

No

No

No

Organization focused specifically on providing AT

No

No

No

Yes

Protection and Advocacy Organization

No

No

No

Yes

Technology agency

No

No

No

No

UCP

No

No

No

No

Other

No

No

No

Yes

 

9

Select the option that best describes from where this activity is conducted.

One central location

 

10

If you indicated the use of regional sites, from how many regional sites is the activity conducted?

0

 

11

This activity is available (choose all that apply)

By website

No

By phone

Yes

By e-mail

Yes

By mail

Yes

In person

Yes

 

12

Select the option that best describes the primary type of demonstrations provided by the program.

In-person demonstrations from a fixed location

Select the option that best describes the secondary type of demonstrations provided by the program.

In-person demonstrations that move to multiple sites

 

13

Select the option that best describes the policy of the program for charging individuals with disabilities for a demonstration.

Nothing

 

14

Select the option that best describes the policy of the program for charging professionals for a demonstration.

Nothing

 

15

Devices in the demonstration pool also are made available for the following (choose all that apply).

Device loans

Yes

Evaluations and assessments

Yes

Training

Yes

Public awareness

Yes

 

16

Select the option that best describes what is shared with the device loan program.

Both staff and space

 

17

Provide any additional information about this activity you wish to share.

The Assistive Technology Program for the District of Columbia operates an AT demonstration center known as the District of Columbia Assistive Technology Resource Center (DCATRC). The DCATRC, which was established in 1999, is fully accessible and is located in the District of Columbia Rehabilitation Services Administration (DCRSA) office. The DCATRC is a facility where consumers, family members, employers, educators, service providers and any District of Columbia resident may explore, experience and compare the usefulness of various types of AT equipment, learn about possible product vendors and other related services; and, discuss their applications for devices or services. The DCATRC is staffed by an Assistive Technology Specialist (ATS) who possesses significant expertise in assisting individuals in making informed choices regarding assistive technology devices and services. Staff will also be available to provide off-site demonstrations as needed including demonstrations at the DC Disability Equipment Recycling site.

The ATPDC Program will collaborate with vendors and specialized AT experts to provide demonstrations of a variety of AT devices that address the needs of specific disabilities and/or groups within the community, schools, and worksites. The ATPDC Program will continue to make an effort to expand Assistive Technology (AT) services to the DC Public Schools. The services include assist on the selections of assistive technology devices and educational software as well as the training on the received products during the IEP.

The DC Assistive Technology staff will make an effort to set up a fee-for-service system providing evaluation and assessment services for individuals with disabilities. This will allow consumers to try a variety of AT devices at the DCATRC to determine the best AT solutions to achieve success in educational, employment and community living endeavors into the formal habilitation, education and/or rehabilitation process.

 


 

Page 6 of 10

Assistive Technology State Grant Program

District of Columbia State Plan for FY 2011-2013
G1 State Leadership Activities

Training Activities

 

1

Who conducts this activity? Check all that apply.

The Statewide AT Program

Yes

Other entities (e.g. contractors)

Yes

 

2

The Statewide AT Program provides and/or receives the following support (choose all that apply).

Provides financial support to other entities via an agreement with the Statewide AT Program.

Yes

Provides in-kind support to other entities via an agreement with the Statewide AT Program.

No

Receives financial support from the state.

No

Receives in-kind support from the state.

No

Receives financial support from private entities.

Yes

Receives in-kind support from private entities.

No

Coordinates and collaborates with other entities for the purpose of establishing a new program or service.

Yes

Coordinates and collaborates with other entities for the purpose of expanding an existing program or service.

Yes

Coordinates and collaborates with other entities for the purpose of reducing duplication of programs or services.

Yes

 

3

If you conduct this activity by providing financial or in-kind support to other entities, identify the kinds of entities you support in column a of the following table.

If you receive financial or in-kind support from the state to conduct this activity, identify the state entities that provide this support in column b of the following table.

If you receive financial or in-kind support from private entities, identify the private entities that provide this support in column c of the following table.

If you coordinate and collaborate with other entities in conducting this activity, identify those entities in column d of the following table.

Organization or Activity

a. You provide support

b. Receive support from the state

c. Receive support from these private entities

d. Collaborate with

AgrAbility Program

No

No

No

No

Alliance for Technology Access Center

No

No

No

No

Bank or other financial institution

No

No

No

No

Community Living agency

No

No

No

No

Easter Seals

No

No

No

No

Education-related agency

No

No

No

No

Employment-related agency

No

No

No

No

Health, allied health, and rehabilitation-related agency

No

No

No

No

Independent Living Center

No

No

No

No

Institution of Higher Education

No

No

No

No

Non-categorical disability organization

No

No

No

No

Organization that primarily serves individuals who are blind or visually impaired

No

No

No

No

Organization that primarily serves individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing

No

No

No

No

Organization that primarily serves individuals with developmental disabilities

No

No

No

No

Organization that primarily serves individuals with physical disabilities

No

No

No

No

Organization focused specifically on providing AT

No

No

No

No

Protection and Advocacy Organization

No

No

No

No

Technology agency

No

No

No

No

UCP

No

No

No

No

Other

No

No

No

Yes

 

4

Select the option that best describes from where this activity is conducted.

One central location

 

5

If you indicated the use of regional sites, from how many regional sites is the activity conducted?

 

6

This activity is available (choose all that apply)

By website

No

By phone

Yes

By e-mail

Yes

By mail

Yes

In person

Yes

 

7

Select the option that best describes how training is primarily provided.

At sites arranged by those receiving the training

 

8

Select the option that best describes the policy of the program for charging individuals with disabilities for training.

Nothing

 

9

Select the option that best describes the policy of the program for charging professionals for training.

Nothing

 

10

Provide any additional information about this activity you wish to share.

Over the next three years, the Assistive Technology Program for the District of Columbia will engage in a number of training activities. ATPDC staff will develop a number of comprehensive, customized and interactive training activities to meet the needs of individuals with disabilities, family members, teachers, school administrators, employers, government agencies and professional service providers in the District of Columbia. ATPDC training modules will involve integrating practical experience and hands-on applications with a discussion of theory and policy as well as ongoing follow-up and support to reinforce and refresh the content.

ATPDC staff and expert consultants will advertise specific subject training workshops in local disability related newsletters, and employee orientation/training schedules of schools and teachers, therapists, and medical personnel. All training information will be available on the ATPDC and other disability related organizations website, mass emails, and flyer distribution during all pubic awareness events.

 


 

Page 7 of 10

Assistive Technology State Grant Program

District of Columbia State Plan for FY 2011-2013
G2 State Leadership Activities

Technical Assistance Activities

 

1

Who conducts this activity? Check all that apply.

The Statewide AT Program

Yes

Other entities (e.g. contractors)

No

 

2

The Statewide AT Program provides and/or receives the following support (choose all that apply).

Provides financial support to other entities via an agreement with the Statewide AT Program.

No

Provides in-kind support to other entities via an agreement with the Statewide AT Program.

No

Receives financial support from the state.

No

Receives in-kind support from the state.

No

Receives financial support from private entities.

No

Receives in-kind support from private entities.

No

Coordinates and collaborates with other entities for the purpose of establishing a new program or service.

Yes

Coordinates and collaborates with other entities for the purpose of expanding an existing program or service.

Yes

Coordinates and collaborates with other entities for the purpose of reducing duplication of programs or services.

Yes

 

3

If you conduct this activity by providing financial or in-kind support to other entities, identify the kinds of entities you support in column a of the following table.

If you receive financial or in-kind support from the state to conduct this activity, identify the state entities that provide this support in column b of the following table.

If you receive financial or in-kind support from private entities, identify the private entities that provide this support in column c of the following table.

If you coordinate and collaborate with other entities in conducting this activity, identify those entities in column d of the following table.

Organization or Activity

a. You provide support

b. Receive support from the state

c. Receive support from these private entities

d. Collaborate with

AgrAbility Program

No

No

No

No

Alliance for Technology Access Center

No

No

No

No

Bank or other financial institution

No

No

No

No

Community Living agency

No

No

No

No

Easter Seals

No

No

No

No

Education-related agency

No

No

No

Yes

Employment-related agency

No

No

No

Yes

Health, allied health, and rehabilitation-related agency

No

No

No

Yes

Independent Living Center

No

No

No

Yes

Institution of Higher Education

No

No

No

Yes

Non-categorical disability organization

No

No

No

No

Organization that primarily serves individuals who are blind or visually impaired

No

No

No

Yes

Organization that primarily serves individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing

No

No

No

No

Organization that primarily serves individuals with developmental disabilities

No

No

No

Yes

Organization that primarily serves individuals with physical disabilities

No

No

No

Yes

Organization focused specifically on providing AT

No

No

No

Yes

Protection and Advocacy Organization

No

No

No

Yes

Technology agency

No

No

No

Yes

UCP

No

No

No

No

Other

No

No

No

Yes

 

4

Select the option that best describes from where this activity is conducted.

One central location

 

5

If you indicated the use of regional sites, from how many regional sites is the activity conducted?

 

6

This activity is available (choose all that apply)

By website

No

By phone

Yes

By e-mail

Yes

By mail

Yes

In person

Yes

 

7

Select the option that best describes the policy of the program for charging for technical assistance.

Nothing

 

8

Provide any additional information about this activity you wish to share.

Over the next three years, ATPDC staff members will provide technical assistance (TA) that generally involves advice and consultation on assistive technology available in the marketplace, proper product application, and funding, purchase and vendor information. ATPDC program staff will provide TA to statewide, local and federal government agencies, service providers and all District of Columbia residents with and without disabilities. Specifically the ATPDC staff will assist District of Columbia agencies develop procurement policies and procedures to purchase appropriate AT devices and services for individuals with disabilities.

 


 

Page 8 of 10

Assistive Technology State Grant Program

District of Columbia State Plan for FY 2011-2013
G3 State Leadership Activities

Public Awareness Activities

 

1

Who conducts this activity? Check all that apply.

The Statewide AT Program

Yes

Other entities (e.g. contractors)

No

 

2

The Statewide AT Program provides and/or receives the following support (choose all that apply).

Provides financial support to other entities via an agreement with the Statewide AT Program.

No

Provides in-kind support to other entities via an agreement with the Statewide AT Program.

No

Receives financial support from the state.

No

Receives in-kind support from the state.

No

Receives financial support from private entities.

No

Receives in-kind support from private entities.

No

Coordinates and collaborates with other entities for the purpose of establishing a new program or service.

Yes

Coordinates and collaborates with other entities for the purpose of expanding an existing program or service.

Yes

Coordinates and collaborates with other entities for the purpose of reducing duplication of programs or services.

Yes

 

3

If you conduct this activity by providing financial or in-kind support to other entities, identify the kinds of entities you support in column a of the following table.

If you receive financial or in-kind support from the state to conduct this activity, identify the state entities that provide this support in column b of the following table.

If you receive financial or in-kind support from private entities, identify the private entities that provide this support in column c of the following table.

If you coordinate and collaborate with other entities in conducting this activity, identify those entities in column d of the following table.

Organization or Activity

a. You provide support

b. Receive support from the state

c. Receive support from these private entities

d. Collaborate with

AgrAbility Program

No

No

No

No

Alliance for Technology Access Center

No

No

No

No

Bank or other financial institution

No

No

No

No

Community Living agency

No

No

No

Yes

Easter Seals

No

No

No

No

Education-related agency

No

No

No

Yes

Employment-related agency

No

No

No

Yes

Health, allied health, and rehabilitation-related agency

No

No

No

Yes

Independent Living Center

No

No

No

Yes

Institution of Higher Education

No

No

No

Yes

Non-categorical disability organization

No

No

No

No

Organization that primarily serves individuals who are blind or visually impaired

No

No

No

Yes

Organization that primarily serves individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing

No

No

No

No

Organization that primarily serves individuals with developmental disabilities

No

No

No

Yes

Organization that primarily serves individuals with physical disabilities

No

No

No

Yes

Organization focused specifically on providing AT

No

No

No

No

Protection and Advocacy Organization

No

No

No

Yes

Technology agency

No

No

No

Yes

UCP

No

No

No

No

Other

No

No

No

Yes

 

4

Select the option that best describes from where this activity is conducted.

One central location

 

5

If you indicated the use of regional sites, from how many regional sites is the activity conducted?

 

6

This activity is available (choose all that apply)

By website

Yes

By phone

Yes

By e-mail

Yes

By mail

Yes

In person

Yes

 

7

Describe the activity.

The Assistive Technology Program for the District of Columbia (ATPDC) uses a multifaceted approach that includes mailings, website, publications, public service announcements, local cable TV advertising, and participation with other agencies, conferences, exhibits, presentations, and trainings to increase awareness of the benefits of AT devices and services. ATPDC staff provides information on the availability, benefits, appropriateness and cost of AT devices and services upon request. We respond to numerous telephone calls, e-mail messages, letters and other inquiries each quarter from consumers, service providers and others interested in learning about assistive technology and our program. ATPDC submits articles related to AT to other community disability-related organizations, publications and newsletters. Our staff members are visible throughout the city at exhibits and conferences. We also conduct presentations.

 

 


 

Page 9 of 10

Assistive Technology State Grant Program

District of Columbia State Plan for FY 2011-2013
G4 State Leadership Activities

Information and Assistance Activities

 

1

Who conducts this activity? Check all that apply.

The Statewide AT Program

Yes

Other entities (e.g. contractors)

No

 

2

The Statewide AT Program provides and/or receives the following support (choose all that apply).

Provides financial support to other entities via an agreement with the Statewide AT Program.

No

Provides in-kind support to other entities via an agreement with the Statewide AT Program.

No

Receives financial support from the state.

No

Receives in-kind support from the state.

No

Receives financial support from private entities.

No

Receives in-kind support from private entities.

No

Coordinates and collaborates with other entities for the purpose of establishing a new program or service.

No

Coordinates and collaborates with other entities for the purpose of expanding an existing program or service.

Yes

Coordinates and collaborates with other entities for the purpose of reducing duplication of programs or services.

Yes

 

3

If you conduct this activity by providing financial or in-kind support to other entities, identify the kinds of entities you support in column a of the following table.

If you receive financial or in-kind support from the state to conduct this activity, identify the state entities that provide this support in column b of the following table.

If you receive financial or in-kind support from private entities, identify the private entities that provide this support in column c of the following table.

If you coordinate and collaborate with other entities in conducting this activity, identify those entities in column d of the following table.

Organization or Activity

a. You provide support

b. Receive support from the state

c. Receive support from these private entities

d. Collaborate with

AgrAbility Program

No

No

No

No

Alliance for Technology Access Center

No

No

No

No

Bank or other financial institution

No

No

No

No

Community Living agency

No

No

No

No

Easter Seals

No

No

No

No

Education-related agency

No

No

No

Yes

Employment-related agency

No

No

No

Yes

Health, allied health, and rehabilitation-related agency

No

No

No

Yes

Independent Living Center

No

No

No

Yes

Institution of Higher Education

No

No

No

Yes

Non-categorical disability organization

No

No

No

Yes

Organization that primarily serves individuals who are blind or visually impaired

No

No

No

Yes

Organization that primarily serves individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing

No

No

No

No

Organization that primarily serves individuals with developmental disabilities

No

No

No

Yes

Organization that primarily serves individuals with physical disabilities

No

No

No

Yes

Organization focused specifically on providing AT

No

No

No

Yes

Protection and Advocacy Organization

No

No

No

Yes

Technology agency

No

No

No

No

UCP

No

No

No

No

Other

No

No

No

Yes

 

4

Select the option that best describes from where this activity is conducted.

One central location

 

5

If you indicated the use of regional sites, from how many regional sites is the activity conducted?

 

6

This activity is available (choose all that apply)

By website

Yes

By phone

Yes

By e-mail

Yes

By mail

Yes

In person

Yes

 

7

Describe the activity.

AT Program staff produced fact sheets and posters that can be produced in-house and customized to allow flexibility in outreaching specific audiences and organizations. ATPDC developed one page flyers to inform the public about the services of the AT program instead of brochures. A poster highlighting individuals with disabilities using assistive technology devices with the tag line Got a Disability- Use Creative Solutions for Living was also developed. The ATPDC will continue its efforts to increase access and acquisition of AT devices by providing public awareness, information and referral services, technical assistance, and customized training on AT issues.

 

 

 

Page 10 of 10

Assistive Technology State Grant Program

District of Columbia State Plan for FY 2009-2011 (submitted FY 2010)

Section H: Assurances and Signature

 

1

As Certifying Representative of the Lead Agency for the District of Columbia, I hereby assure the following.

Yes

 

2

The Lead Agency prepared and submitted this State Plan on behalf of the District of Columbia.

Yes

 

3

The Lead Agency submitting this plan is the State agency that is eligible to submit this plan.

Yes

 

4

The State agency has authority under State law to perform the functions of the State under this program.

Yes

 

5

The State legally may carry out each provision of this plan.

Yes

 

6

All provisions of this plan are consistent with State law.

Yes

 

7

A State officer, specified by title in this certification, has authority under State law to receive, hold, and disburse Federal funds made available under the plan.

Yes

 

8

The State officer who submits this plan, specified by title in this certification, has authority to submit this plan.

Yes

 

9

The agency that submits this plan has adopted or otherwise formally approved this plan.

Yes

 

10

The plan is the basis for State operation and administration of the program.

Yes

 

11

The Lead Agency will maintain and evaluate the program under this State Plan.

Yes

 

12

The State will annually collect data related to the required activities implemented by the State under this section in order to prepare the progress reports required under subsection 4(f) of the Act.

Yes

 

13

The Lead Agency will submit the progress report on behalf of the State.

Yes

 

14

The State will prepare reports to the Secretary in such form and containing such information as the Secretary may require to carry out the Secretary's functions under this Act and keep such records and allow access to such records as the Secretary may require to ensure the correctness and verification of information provided to the Secretary.

Yes

 

15

The Lead Agency will control and administer the funds received through the grant.

Yes

 

16

The Lead Agency will make programmatic and resource allocation decisions necessary to implement the State Plan.

Yes

 

17

Funds received through the grant will be expended in accordance with Section 4 of the Act, and will be used to supplement, and not supplant, funds available from other sources for technology-related assistance, including the provision of assistive technology devices and assistive technology services.

Yes

 

18

The Lead Agency will ensure conformance with Federal and State accounting requirements.

Yes

 

19

The State will adopt such fiscal control and accounting procedures as may be necessary to ensure proper disbursement of and accounting for the funds received through the grant.

Yes

 

20

Funds made available through a grant to a State under this Act will not be used for direct payment for an assistive technology device for an individual with a disability.

Yes

 

21

A public agency or an individual with a disability holds title to any property purchased with funds received under the grant and administers that property.

Yes

 

22

The physical facility of the Lead Agency and Implementing Entity, if any, meets the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq.) regarding accessibility for individuals with disabilities. Section 4(d)(6)(E)

Yes

 

23

Activities carried out in the State that are authorized under this Act, and supported by Federal funds received under this Act, will comply with the standards established by the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board under section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (20 U.S.C. 794d). Section 4(d)(6)(G)

Yes

 

24

The Lead Agency will coordinate the activities of the State Plan among public and private entities, including coordinating efforts related to entering into interagency agreements.

Yes

 

25

The Lead Agency will coordinate efforts related to the active, timely, and meaningful participation by individuals with disabilities and their family members, guardians, advocates, or authorized representatives, and other appropriate individuals, with respect to activities carried out through the grant.

Yes

 

26

Describe how your program will conform to section 427 of General Education Provisions Act by describing the steps you propose to take to ensure equitable access to, and participation in, your program for students, teachers, and other program beneficiaries with special needs.

The District of Columbia Department on Disability Services, Rehabilitation Services Administration (DC RSA) will take all the necessary steps to ensure equitable access to, and participation in, all programs and services provided by DC Rehabilitation Services Administration as described in the State Plan for Assistive Technology. All partners and subcontractors will comply with the GEPA (General Education Provisions Act), section 427. Specifically, DC RSA will ensure equitable access regardless of gender, race, national origin, color, disability or age and will implement the following activities to address potential access barriers.

1) All print materials will be available in alternative formats (e.g. Braille, large print, electronic text, and audio) and available in languages other than English as needed. Materials will be developed with due consideration of cultural diversity issues along with literacy demands and other factors critical to ensuring usability by a diverse audience.
2) All meetings or events will be held in facilities that comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act Architectural Guidelines and communication accommodations (e.g. real time captioning, sign language interpreters, other language interpreters, etc.) will be provided as needed.
3) We will ensure that web sites are accessible to ensure accessibility to a wide variety of individuals with diverse information processing needs.
4) We will systemically targeted our public awareness efforts to groups and individuals that are underserved that live in areas of the city that are geographically and economically distant from services that provide access and acquisition of assistive technology devices and services.

 

27

Access Goal Table

 

Access

Education

Employment

Community Living

IT/Telecomm

a. Long-term Goal

80.00

80.00

90.00

50.00

b. Long-term Goal Status

Not met

Not met

Not met

Not met

c. FY 2007 Performance

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

d. FY 2008 Short-term goal

80.00

80.00

90.00

50.00

e. FY 2008 Performance

85.53

88.17

91.30

0.00

f. FY 2008 Status

Met

Met

Met

Not met

g. FY 2009 Short-term goal

80.00

80.00

90.00

50.00

h. FY 2009 Performance

90.91

90.16

69.23

100.00

i. FY 2009 Status

Met

Met

Not met

Met

j. FY 2010 Short-term goal

80.00

80.00

90.00

50.00

k. FY 2010 Performance

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

l. FY 2010 Status

Not met

Not met

Not met

Not met

 

28

Acquisition Goal Table

 

Acquisition

Education

Employment

Community Living

a. Long-term Goal

75.00

75.00

90.00

b. Long-term Goal Status

Not met

Not met

Not met

c. FY 2007 Performance

100.00

100.00

100.00

d. FY 2008 Short-term goal

75.00

75.00

90.00

e. FY 2008 Performance

100.00

91.67

99.49

f. FY 2008 Status

Met

Met

Met

g. FY 2009 Short-term goal

75.00

75.00

90.00

h. FY 2009 Performance

99.26

69.57

99.83

i. FY 2009 Status

Met

Not met

Met

j. FY 2010 Short-term goal

75.00

75.00

90.00

k. FY 2010 Performance

0.00

0.00

0.00

l. FY 2010 Status

Not met

Not met

Not met

 

29

Name of Certifying Representative for the Lead Agency

Roy Albert

 

30

Title of Certifying Representative for the Lead Agency

Deputy Director of the Rehabilitation Services Administration

 

31

Signed?

Yes

 

32

Date Signed

01/16/2009

 

According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number of this information collection is 1820-0664. The time required to complete this information collection is estimated to average 75 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather the data needed, and complete and review the information collection. If you have any comments concerning the accuracy of the time estimate or suggestions for improving this form, please write to: U.S. Department of Education, Washington, D.C. 20202-4760. If you have any comments or concerns regarding the status of your individual submission of this form, write directly to: Robert Groenendaal.